David Sandalow, a Brookings Institution energy expert, said of offshore drilling, "It's like walking an extra 20 feet a day to lose weight. It's just not enough to make a difference."
As for ANWR? Bush's own Department of Energy estimated that drilling in the Arctic refuge would cut oil prices by only about 75 cents a barrel. What's more, even if the refuge were opened this year, its extracted oil would not reach the market for 10 years.
Bush blamed "Democrats on Capitol Hill" who he said "have rejected virtually every proposal" to increase oil production, adding "now Americans are paying the price at the pump for this obstruction." Congress is not blocking domestic drilling. In fact, the number of drilling permits both on- and off-shore has exploded from 3,802 five years ago to 7,561 in 2007. Congress and the Bush administration have opened up so much land to drilling that oil companies can't keep up: In the last four years, the government has issued 28,776 permits to drill on public land, yet only 18,954 wells were actually drilled. Congressional obstruction is just one of the false arguments conservatives are peddling.
Another is the idea that we can drill and still "ensure that our environment is protected." McCain declared drilling is so "safe" that "not even Hurricane Katrina and Rita could cause significant spillage from battered rigs off the coasts of New Orleans and Houston." This is patently false. Hurricane Katrina caused 44 oil spills, resulting in more than seven million gallons of oil spilled, according to the Coast Guard., nearing the nine million gallons spilled in the 1989 Exxon-Valdez disaster.
Big Oil has also vigorously backed McCain's campaign. McCain ranks second in the Senate for donations from the energy industry and has raised over $700,000 from oil and gas this election season alone.
There are three things that are driving up the price of oil: the falling dollar, speculation and buying on margin.
The dollar is tanking because of the Federal Reserve's low interest monetary policies have kept interest rates below the rate of inflation for most of the last decade. Add that to the $700 billion current account deficit and a National Debt that has increased from $5.8 trillion when Bush first took office to over $9 trillion today (TPJ: In large part too because of the Iraq war) and it's a wonder the dollar hasn't gone “Poof” already.
According to a January 4 editorial in the Wall Street Journal: “If the dollar had remained 'as good as gold' since 2001, oil today would be selling at about $30 per barrel, not $99. (today $126 per barrel) The decline of the dollar against gold and oil suggests a US monetary that is supplying too many dollars.” Wall Street Journal 1-4-08
The price of oil has more than quadrupled since 2001, from roughly $30 per barrel to $126, WITHOUT ANY DISRUPTIONS TO SUPPLY. There's no shortage; it's just gibberish.
As far as “buying on margin” consider this summary from author William Engdahl:
“A conservative calculation is that at least 60% of today’s $128 per barrel price of crude oil comes from unregulated futures speculation by hedge funds, banks and financial groups using the London ICE Futures and New York NYMEX futures exchanges and uncontrolled inter-bank or Over-The-Counter trading to avoid scrutiny. US margin rules of the government’s Commodity Futures Trading Commission allow speculators to buy a crude oil futures contract on the Nymex, by having to pay only 6% of the value of the contract. At today's price of $128 per barrel, that means a futures trader only has to put up about $8 for every barrel. He borrows the other $120. This extreme “leverage” of 16 to 1 helps drive prices to wildly unrealistic levels and offset bank losses in sub-prime and other disasters at the expense of the overall population.”
The rest of this write up is well worth reading and helpful in understanding the energy crisis. However, for purposes of brevity in this post I am just going to give you the link to the rest of it.
TPJ: There are no quick fixes folks. We aren't going to get instant gratification on this one anymore. Our gas filled utopia is coming to an end and we need to face some hard facts about our lifestyles.
The bottom line I think is that people will only change once it starts hitting their pocket books so maybe high prices are a good thing?
Spurring on quicker investment and development of alternative energies. We might have to really tighten the belt, conserve and sacrifice for a time but that's the only way. We Americans are so use to quick fixes and aren't use to sacrificing but we are going to have to get use to it for a time.
Nothing new comes without a price but in the long-term is will make our country all the more stronger. It's like the Phoenix rising from the ashes. All great civilizations have to reinvent themselves along the way to survive.
6 comments:
As far as ANWR is concerned, I read an article that was posted in 2005 that said it would only lower prices by 30-50 cents a barrel when oil was at $40! it would likely be 10-15 cents a barrel in today's climate.
The moronic monkey's usual sniping gets more despicable with each new screech and fling of poop.
I can't wait to find out how he blames Iowa on the dems.
The sad thing is, too many people in middle america will listen to the republicans and think there is a fix.
Thanks for more details on this. I'm not up to speed on how the falling dollar, speculation and buying on margin works, so this was helpful.
Of course, no one wants to hear complicated factors like this, but we need to know the full, true picture. Meanwhile, the political spin continues.
Plug-in cars are a joke! Talk about more strain on the environment. If you drive a plug-in and get your electricity from a coal plant, YOUR CAR IS COAL POWERED! The electrical grid already struggles to provide enough power in summer and winter. There isn't enough electrical generation on the grid for millions of plug-in cars! Then there is the issue with the batteries. They are EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE to replace and they do have to be replaced every few years. Those batteries are also harmful to the environment if not handled properly. One car slated for release next year uses 6,000 LAPTOP batteries! HOW MUCH TO REPLACE THOSE BATTERIES IN A FEW YEARS?
The majority of the answer to our energy independence lies in clean-burning coal, domestic crude oil production, natural gas exploration, and new nuclear power plants. Wind and solar are a drop in the bucket. New hydro-electric plants coming online will be few and far between.
There is no net energy gain from hydrogen-powered cars as it takes electricity to produce the hydrogen. The only real attraction to hydrogen powered cars is areas of heavy population density could reduce smog. Just remember the other end of that plug could be burning coal and straining the grid.
We must drill here. AND NOW. The antis that keep saying 'it will be ten years' aren't listening (heck, they refuse to) to the industry drilling experts as they say the oil will be flowing in two years.
Just the news of drilling being allowed in restricted areas will send prices down. The "ten year" argument is nothing but a lie.
Anonymous:
The technology is now here for people to get the electricity for their cars via new, smaller, more powerful solar panels. It won't be much longer before all homes will be able to afford the panels to both heat their homes and charge their cars. My wife works for a solar company that has is developing that technology.
In fact right now it only costs $20,000 to retrofit your home is about the price of those big SUVS. And the savings in the long run will more than pay for itself.
New battery technologies are emerging that are increasingly less problematic such as lithium batteries. Lithium is an element that is safe for humans to ingest even!! It is used to help treat bipolar disorder.
"Toyota and Honda place decals with a toll-free number on their hybrid battery packs. Toyota offers a $200 bounty to ensure that every battery comes back to the company. In a press release, Toyota states, "Every part of the battery, from the precious metals to the plastic, plates, steel case and the wiring, is recycled." Honda collects the battery and transfers it to a preferred recycler to follow their prescribed process: disassembling and sorting the materials; shredding the plastic material; recovering and processing the metal; and neutralizing the alkaline material before sending it to a landfill."Link.</A
Besides, battery disposal is less problematic and toxic than the nuclear waste that is the result of the nuclear energy you advocate.
Post a Comment