Saturday, January 05, 2008

Hillary Clinton is Getting Desperate. Slams Iowa Voters.

In the wake of Hillary Clinton's shellacking in Iowa, she is about to get desperate with a predictable onslaught of mudslinging attacks at a surging Barack Obama. The floor was ripped out from under Hillary as her, taken for granted base, women, ripped in half breaking mostly for Obama. She is a calculating, bean counting, opportunistic politician who plays the numbers and clearly over-looked the youth vote as well and payed dearly for it in Iowa.

But being her true self she blamed others for her lose in Iowa namely, the entire state of Iowa.

"Iowa does not have the best track record in determining who the parties nominate. Everybody knows that."

She just can't stop playing the role of super bitch. This is her true nature, this is yet more evidence that she doesn't really care about voters. She only cares about winning and will do and say anything to get where she wants to go. Of course, before the Iowa primary she was talking up Iowa as if it was Shangri-la. She was saying how smart they are but they saw right through her smoke screen and voted instead for the more sincere, Obama. Now that she lost, she sees Iowans as worthless idiots who don't know shit. I would like to see what she would say later to Iowans in the general campaign if she were to somehow get the Democratic nomination.

She may think saying such things won't hurt her anymore because the Iowa vote is over but once again is under-estimating people by over playing her hand. Does she not think that the rest of the country won't notice her bashing Iowa? If she has such disdain for them, what does that say about her concern for the rest of us? Not much. Is she going to blame New Hampshire voters too if she should lose again there? Probably. So this is her typical attitude, it's everyone's fault but hers.

New Hampshire might be a new state and a new opportunity for her to win but she's still her same old arrogant self and you can't polish a turd.

She's still trying to sell this, "I'm so experienced" crap. Experienced at what? I'll tell you what, manipulation. Dissing Iowans just shows us how divisive she would be as president and more sharply contrasts with Obama's inclusive message of hope and change. If she is so quick to divide her own party, how does anyone expect her to heal the wounds of this country and be even somewhat successful at bringing the two sides together? She's a charlatan and chameleon. Her campaign slogan changes with the polls. She does represent change but negative change in that she changes her opinions and message whenever it seems politically expedient. I know most politicians do this to one degree or another but its her only card because she doesn't know how to be real and sincere. She's not "ready to lead on day one" but rather "ready to divide on day one."

---End of Transmission---

8 comments:

T&A said...

I saw this. Tweety slammed her on Hardball over her statement. For once I agreed with him. And I certainly agree with you! Super Bitch is right!

James said...

T&A:

Yeah I was glad to see him knock her around a bit over it as well. Although we still have to keep donating and fighting the fight, I think she's done for.

Anonymous said...

It's politically expedient to go with her now. Unless you're Republican. Maybe your are. Maybe that is what is going on.

Robert Rouse said...

The more she takes hits in the polls (and now the votes) the more the bitch side of her is going to slip out in public. I say it couldn't happen to a nicer woman. No, really - a nicer woman wouldn't be acting like Super Bitch!

Lynne said...

Just imagine this mentality in the White House. Oh, wait... that's what we have.
She's George Bush in a dress.

Riverwolf said...

Ever seen that slogan: "You say bitch like it's a bad thing?" Hillary's still my girl until the final vote is counted. I don't need someone just like me (as Huckabee says) to run the country. She doesn't even have to be nice. Just be careful how high you build Obama's pedestal. Clinton is a known quantity, and yes, lots of people hate her. Obama--we're projecting onto him all our own hopes and dreams. If elected, we'll then see the real man, and while I'm sure we could do a lot worse, I'm just tired of being disappointed. And Obama's whole "we're not a nation of red states and blue states"--what is he smoking? We are not a united country. Just wait til he starts trying to tinker with everything, and then you'll see all those divisions reappear. And it'll catch Obama totally off guard. Sometimes you need a bitch to actually get things done.

James said...

Anonymous:

I'm no Republican by any stretch that's for sure. ;)

Robert:

I agree with you whole-heartedly.

Lynne:

Well, I guess I trust him more than the only real other option (Hillary).

While I am mostly anti-war, sometimes we do have to do it such as during WWII. I think Obama would do everything to avoid war with Iran but if it became absolutely necessary then I'd back it and him.

He certainly would be less likely to go to war than Hillary I think. I wish Kucinich could get some major traction but he's just fading and I don't want to support him to the end that it might help elect Hillary Clinton.

But the circumstances would have to be drastic such as Iran having fully invaded Iraq (or another country/countries) or launching and hitting several targets in Israel with major missiles.

I think Iran could easily strike Turkey as well and that is one of our allies which would be a serious provocation that we could not avoid. Unfortunately sometimes we have to go to war.

Riverwolf:

I agree that we are not a nation united but I think that Hillary would divide it even more. Her unfavorable ratings are MUCH higher than Obamas. The other reason not to back her because of that fact is that she is less electable.

So in my opinion, if you don't want to be disappointed again then you should go with Obama. I think that he has a much better chance of winning in the general.

Yes, Obama may indeed cause divides eventually but Hillary would do so on day one. I don't think Obama is the answer to all our hopes and dreams but I think he's a big step forward more then Hillary could give us. That's just my opinion of course and while we disagree on our choice, I'm just glad that you're involved and supporting the liberal side of politics. :)

James said...

Lynne:

Sorry that first reply is in regards to your comment left on the Kucinich factor post. In regards to this comment, I agree that she would basically be Bush light.