Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Mitt Romney's Macaca Moment

UPDATE:

Romney has also now compared Senator Hillary Clinton to Karl Marx.

"Hillary Clinton just gave a speech the other day about her view on the economy. She said we have been an on-your-own society. She said it's time to get rid of that and replace that with shared responsibility and we're-in-it-together society," Romney told the crowd. "That's out with Adam Smith and in with Karl Marx."

James: This guy just can't resist name calling. When a candidate resorts to name calling it shows that they don't have much substance and are desperate. That and it shows their immaturity and inability to act presidential--Romney certainly isn't showing us that he can be a true statesman. Is this the kind of person we want representing us to foreign leaders?

----------------------------

Have you seen this picture of Mitt Romney holding a sign that childishly plays on Barack Obama's name rhyming and sounding like that of Osama? Apparently name calling is all that Romney has to offer--that and flip-flopping on issue after issue. I was upset with Kerry for flip-flopping in 2004 as much as the Republicans yet when it comes to one of their own being an even bigger flip-flopper then Kerry--they remain silent.

Romney's explanation was even worse--he told everyone to "lighten up." Yeah that's really classy Mitt. Tell the families of the victims of 9/11 who support Obama to "lighten up." The presidential candidate dug himself an even deeper hole in saying the following:

"I don't look at all the signs when I'm having my picture taken. I have a lot of pictures taken with people," Romney said. "I don't really spend all that much time looking at the signs and the T-shirts and the buttons. I don't have anything to say about a sign somebody else was holding."

GOI: Wow. Where do I start with this big pile of b.s.?? Well, first off he should look at all the signs that people are holding when he's having his picture taken. I don't want a president who will dumbly take his picture with anyone holding god knows what might be on it. We've had enough of dumb in the Oval Office the last 6 years. The sign could be doctored but I highly doubt it as it was run on MSNBC which surely vets their stories as best as possible.

However, worst of all he tells a whooper of a lie by saying he wasn't even holding the sign when clearly he was when you look at the picture!! What a piece of work. I guess traditional family values include lying.

I'd be just as furious if this was a Democratic in this situation--and especially if he was a Buddhist (my faith). I wonder if Mormon supporters will turn a blind to this or stand up and repudiate Romney for representing their faith in such an ignorant fashion. I hope that they do the right thing and separate themselves from this clown. I wouldn't hold him to such a strict standard if he didn't walk around pounding his chest about family values and how he's such a good Christian. If you think I'm being too hard on the guy by calling him a Christian hypocrite--can you honestly see Jesus holding up such a sign?? Of course not.

There wouldn't be a flap if he had just come out and said that he got caught up in the moment and held up a sign that he shouldn't have and that he in no way supports the logic written on it--and yet he didn't. He seems to be too proud and arrogant to tell us the truth even when it is staring us boldly in the face from that picture!!!

Here is the video of Jared from Buckeye State Blog asking Romney about the incident:



---End of Transmission---

5 comments:

Tracy Hall Jr said...

For what it's worth, I do oppose Obama, Osama, and you-know-who -- just not all to the same degree.

But I do believe that Obama and you-know-who would both be good for Osama.

And no, Romney didn't have time to run that sign past the politically-correct police.

Get a sense of humor. It's good for your health.

James said...

Tracy:

Tell me. Would he (or you) "laugh it off" if say, Obama or Clinton held up a similar sign? I doubtit--nor should you laugh it off if they did. And I noticed that you are LDS--do you support Romney and if so is it simply out of blind loyalty to another member being Romney? I would hope that you would support him for other reasons then that.

And if you do support him for other reasons, what would those be that are different then the other (R) candidates?

Romney didn't have time to look at the sign?? Give me break. A presidential candidate should be observant. I don't want a president who isn't even aware of his supporters signs. What does that say about how observant he would be on the important issues?? I mean, how hard is it to look at a sign??

However, the kicker is why he held up the sign if he didn't know what it said?? Who goes around holding up signs that they don't look at??

And why did he clearly say in his response to the criticism that he didn't even hold the sign when the picture noticeably shows him doing just that?? Do you really want someone who bold face lies like that as president?? I certainly do not.

I want a president who tells the truth and who can admit when they pulled a bone head move. There is certainly precious too little of that (if any) in our current administration.

For the record, I do not support Obama or Clinton and I wish to see Osama tried in the International Court in The Hague.

Oh and if you bothered to get to know me then you would know that I have a great sense of humor--just ask anyone on the blog or my many other blogs.

Brent said...

James:

Would Romney be trying to make political hay out of a Democratic Presidential Contender holding up a sign that said:

Hey Romney:
Where are your other 4 wives at?

You bet you ass he would and he would be saying that the Contender was being prejudicial. So for him to say lighten up is just another hypocritical statement from the flip-flopper from the great state of Massachusetts.

Undeniable Liberal said...

Wouldn't it be too cool to see Clinton or Obama posing with a clever alliterative sign that referred to Mitt Rommel?

James said...

Brent:

Yeah you're right. Good point--I'd love to see his reaction to a sign like that.

Liberal:

Absolutely. These guys can't take it when you put the shoe on the other foot.