
I. "Scooter" Libby is Dick "Darth" Cheney's Chief of Staff and is in serious question regarding the CIA-Plame leak.
The lastest news came today via
The American Prospect:
I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, has told federal investigators that he met with New York Times reporter Judith Miller on July 8, 2003, and discussed CIA operative Valerie Plame, according to legal sources familiar with libby's account.
GOI: Uh-oh. Somebody is in TRAAA-BOLE. Now we know who Judith Miller is protecting. Or at least ONE of the people she is protecting. She could be protecting the V.P. and/or the President himself. The vice-president's aide does nothing unless it is approved by Cheney himself I am sure. That is what an aide does. The bidding of this boss. I would be quite shocked to learn that Cheney had NO idea that Libby and Rove were talking to Matt Cooper and Judy Miller respectively. Anyway, back to the article:
The meeting between Libby and Miller has been a central focus of the investigation by special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald as to whether any Bush administration official broke the law by unmasking Plame's identity or relied on classified information to discredit former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson, according to sources close to the case as well as documents filed in federal court by Fitzgerald.
GOI: You gotta believe that indictments are coming down after all of this scrutiny. Fitzgerald is hot on the trail of something and I doubt it's a "goose chase." It is quite apparent that more then one person has broken the law here and it appears that a pattern and plan of smearing and deception by the Bush administration has been uncovered:
The meeting between Libby and Miller also occurred during a week of intense activity by Libby and White House deputy chief of staff Karl Rove aimed at discrediting Plame's husband, Wilson, who on July 6, 2003, had gone public in a New York Times opinion piece with allegations that the Bush administration was misrepresenting intelligence information to make the case to go to war with Iraq.
GOI: Huh, ironic that the very two people that are known to be under the scrutiny of Fitzgerald are the very same people who were intensely involved in discrediting Joe Wilson's claims. Hmm. Ya think Fitz is on to somethin' here?! That's the understatement of the year. Anyway, back we go to the article:
The new disclosure that Miller and Libby met on July 8, 2003, raises questions regarding claims by President Bush that he and everyone in his administration have done everything possible to assist Fitzgerald's grand-jury probe.
GOI: What?!! Bush might have LIED about something??? No. That can't be. It's not like he's ever done that before (coughing, "weapons of mass destruction in Iraq). Ahem, pardon me I just had to clear my throat. I think we can continue now:
Congressman Rush Holt, Democrat of New Jersey and a member of the House Intelligence Committee, while sidestepping the specifics as to whether Bush should order Libby to provide a personalized waiver for Miller, said in an interview Friday evening: "I would say the president has the power to help us get to the bottom of this matter. And we in Congress want to do this not so much for what has happened but to prevent such a thing from happening again."
GOI: Hmm, so if President Bush is not co-operating fully with this investigation then is that not obstruction of justice?? It couldn't possibley be a case of covering up for his "captains" could it??? Also, if Bush has nothing to hide then why doesn't he become more involved in helping Congress get to the bottom of the matter? Just something to think about.
Rove and Libby have reportedly claimed that they learned of the information from journalists.
But investigators have focused on whether Rove or Libby rather first learned about Plame's CIA employment and her possible role in recommending that her husband be sent to Niger from a classified State Department memo circulated to senior Bush administration officials in the days just prior to their conversations with journalists.
Dated June 10, 2003, the memo was written for Marc Grossman, then the undersecretary of state for political affairs. It mentioned Plame, her employment with the CIA, and her possible role in recommending her husband for the Niger mission because he had previously served in the region. The mention of Plame's CIA employment was classified "Secret" and was contained in the second paragraph of the three-page classified paper.
GOI: Rove: Oops, you mean I wasn't supposed to pass around that "CLASSIFED: SECRET MEMO" to all the top officials in the administration as if it were a dirty magazine?? My bad.
On July 8, Novak and Rove first spoke about Plame, according to numerous press accounts. That was also the day that Libby and Miller met in Washington, D.C., to discuss Plame.
GOI: Isn't it amazing that Rove and Libby were involved in talking to Novak and Miller on the same day? Sure, it looks like a planned, concerted effort but well, but nothing. The coincidence is damning.
On July 9, then-CIA director George Tenet ordered aides to draft a statement that the Niger information that the President relied on "did not rise to the level of certainty which should be required for the presidential speeches, and the CIA should have ensured that it was removed." Rove and Libby were reportedly involved in the drafting of that statement’s language.
Three days later, on July 11, Rove spoke about Plame to Cooper.
GOI: Fascinating that this all happens in a progessive, chronilogical pattern. I wonder why?
Two days later, on July 14, Novak published his column disclosing Plame's employment with the CIA, describing her as an "agency operative" and alleging that she suggested her husband for the Niger mission.
GOI: Wow, this article is the best time-line piece over this traitor-gate investigation that I have read yet.
---End of Transmission---